motorised star trackers

see also:

Introduction

  • the new strain wave design / harmonic mounts are fantastic for portability and avoids need for counterweights BUT for good results, you need to have an autoguider for imaging with them!
    • strain wave mounts are really tricky - the constant motion means guiding images need to be good enough at 0.5-1s refresh vs the more necessary 2s for most with OAGs on traditional mounts
    • not as good in windy conditions
    • unlike traditional mounts, if they lose power the scope may slowly rotate to the bottom unless there is a RA auto-brake that prevents this
    • they usually specify a torque in Nm for use without a counterweight and this allows you to ascertain your max. weight of your scope system you can use:
      • eg. the max. 16Nm rated Nema14 34mm stepper motor and the centre of your scope axis / centre of mass is 20cm from the mount axis then 16/0.2m = 80N = 8kg (as 80N = 8kg x 9.8 m/s gravity)
    • a brushless servo motor with encoder feedback loop is better than stepper motor as:
      • much faster reaction time to start moving: stepper motors 100-200msec servos < 10msec
      • higher torque allowing faster reaction to moving it, but does need an encoder feedback loop system (these are often low end encoders lacking high precision)
      • a high end precision encoder with a servo motor is considered most accurate than stepper motors as even though a stepper motor should move a specific amount, it does not mean it actually does move that amount (wind, out of balance, overweight, resistance in system, gear backlash, etc.), hence an encoder / closed loop is used on higher end scopes.
      • a downside of a servo is that they can get burnt out as they do not like forced stops when turned on such as the scope hitting into a wall - but some will have protections for this

Portable motorized star trackers